In 1970, he wrote that a corporation's only responsibility is to increase its profits.
Milton Friedman was born on July 31, 1912, in Brooklyn, New York, to Jewish immigrants from Carpathian Ruthenia in the Kingdom of Hungary.1 His parents ran a dry goods store. The family moved to Rahway, New Jersey, where Friedman grew up, later describing financial crisis as a constant companion of his childhood.2
He won a scholarship to Rutgers University, graduating in 1932 with concentrations in mathematics and economics. He earned his master's degree from the University of Chicago in 1933 and his doctorate from Columbia University in 1946.3
In September 1970, Friedman published an essay in the New York Times Magazine titled "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits." The argument was concise. Corporate executives are employees of the owners of the business. Their responsibility is to conduct the business in accordance with the owners' desires, which generally means making as much money as possible.4 Any executive who spends corporate money on social causes is, in Friedman's framing, imposing a tax on shareholders.
The essay became one of the most cited texts in the history of business ethics. It provided the intellectual framework for what later became known as shareholder primacy, the doctrine that a corporation exists to maximize returns to its owners above all other considerations.
Friedman's influence extended well beyond academic economics. His 1962 book Capitalism and Freedom advocated school vouchers, a volunteer army, and a negative income tax. His ideas shaped the economic policies of President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.5 A group of Chilean economists trained at the University of Chicago, later known as the "Chicago Boys," implemented his prescriptions in Chile under Augusto Pinochet, a connection that generated lasting controversy.6
His 1980 PBS television series Free to Choose, co-created with his wife Rose, reached millions of viewers. The accompanying book became a bestseller.7 The Economist described him upon his death in 2006 as "the most influential economist of the second half of the 20th century, possibly of all of it."8